Whirley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that control exercised over buy was adequate Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-PC-2262 | September 8, 2020 Page 9 of 13 to serve as basis for issuance of search warrant, notwithstanding fact that informant was out of officer’s sight for 20 seconds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Flaherty v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-12-27· cited 31×
• Haynes v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1982-02-11· cited 30×
• Osborne v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-03-25· cited 18×
• Watson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-12-30· cited 14×
• Paul Parsley v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-09-08

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Aguilar v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
• Spinelli v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
• Brinegar v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
• United States v. Ventresca
  Supreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
• Hignut v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-04-06· cited 53×
• Collins v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 52×
• Mills v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1978-09-05· cited 50×
• Ringley v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-10-16· cited 10×
• Potter v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-02-12· cited 7×
• Kizer v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-10-24· cited 6×