Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 5/16/1991

Wheeler v. John Deere Co.

Citations

  • 935 F.2d 1090
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9885
  • 1991 WL 78087

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court may release a party from a conclusory stipulation if the stipulation is \limited expressly to a single trial\
  • holding that a district court may release a party from a eonclusory stipulation if the stipulation is “limited expressly to a single trial”
  • holding that an expert can testify “within the reasonable confines of his subject area . . . a lack of specialization does not affect the admissibility of [the expert] opinion, but only its weight”
  • pegging the accrual of postjudment interest from the remand judgment because earlier reversal was complete reversal on the merits
  • mechanical engineer with expertise in the design of farm equipment permitted to testify on consumer expectations despite lack of experience in consumer sampling
  • “lack of specialization does not affect the admissibility of the opinion but only its weight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Baldock, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

113 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.