Allen v. Minnstar, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, when determining whether an inconsistency exists between a jury’s special finding and its general verdict, “all reasonable presumptions must be exercised in favor of the general verdict”
• noting that when determining whether an inconsistency exists between a jury’s special finding and its general verdict, “all reasonable presumptions must be exercised in favor of the general verdict”
• court properly entered judgment in accordance with jury’s intent where jury filled out verdict form B but signed verdict form C
• court properly entered judgment in accordance with jury's intent where jury filled out verdict form B but signed verdict form C
• special finding both the plaintiff and defendant were the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries was reconciled with general verdict for the defendant on inference jury found the plaintiff at least 51% negligent and entitled to no recovery
• special finding that both the plaintiff and defendant were the proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries was reconciled with general verdict for the defendant on inference jury found the plaintiff at least 51% negligent and entitled to no recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).