Whatley's Interiors, Inc. v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that defendant “had no interest in the subject property” was a ruling “on the merits of the claim” and “should . . . have been treated as a grant of summary judgment rather than a dismissal”
• service not proper on an employee who did not perform any other duties besides those of a secretary/typist
• service not proper on an employee who did not perform any other duties besides those of a secretary/typist
• service not proper on \personal secretary/typist\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).