Franchell v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plainly, the statute affords the court the option to decide the matter by affidavit or deposition testimony or to decide the motion on the basis of oral testimony.”
• sufficiency of service is a factual question to be resolved by the trial court
• “Although [the appellant] claimfs] that [he was] prevented from presenting live testimony at the [termination] hearing, [he has] failed to make a proffer of evidence and to explain how such evidence would have assisted in resolving the controversy about the perfection of service.”
• “Although [the appellant] claim[s] that [he was] prevented from presenting live testimony at the [termination] hearing, [he has] failed to make a proffer of evidence and to explain how such evidence would have assisted in resolving the controversy about the perfection of service.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).