Tenth Circuit· 6/5/1992
West v. Grand County
Citations
- 967 F.2d 362
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12978
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a public employee has a property right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment when that “person’s employment can be terminated only for specified reasons”
- finding that a meeting with the supervisor, who ultimately terminated the employee, provided “sufficient notice and opportunity to respond to satisfy the pretermination due process requirements”
- finding that a meeting with the supervisor, who ultimately terminated the employee, provided “sufficient notice and opportunity to respond to satisfy the pretermination due process requirements”
- finding no violation of due process resulting from lack of cross-examination where plaintiff did not request witness’s presence at hearing and there was no suggestion she was restricted from doing so
- “individual entitled to due process protection needs only to be given notice and an opportunity to respond”
- where plaintiff did not compel attendance and there is no indication she was restricted from calling witnesses, plaintiff could not complain of violation of right to confrontation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Riggins v. GoodmanTenth Circuit· 2009-07-10· cited 222×
- Montgomery v. City of ArdmoreTenth Circuit· 2004-04-28· cited 118×
- Hulen v. YatesTenth Circuit· 2003-03-04· cited 79×
- Copelin-Brown v. New Mexico State Personnel OfficeTenth Circuit· 2005-03-01· cited 55×
- McClure v. Independent School District No. 16Tenth Circuit· 2000-10-06· cited 46×
- Thompson v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2005-10-28· cited 35×
- Grabow v. Independent School Dist. No. I-008Second Circuit· 1996-05-29· cited 9×
- DeMarco v. Cuyahoga County Department of Human ServicesN.D. Ohio· 1998-07-24· cited 3×
- Hennigh v. City of ShawneeTenth Circuit· 1998-09-09
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 6,903×
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court· 1988-03-02· cited 3,553×
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 3,052×
- Melton v. City of Oklahoma CityTenth Circuit· 1989-06-21· cited 166×
- Carmen ARCHULETA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS, DIVISION OF YOUTH SERVICES, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesTenth Circuit· 1991-06-20· cited 144×
- William C. Powell v. Thomas J. Mikulecky, George Oates, Ruth Stephens and Wendall GilliamTenth Circuit· 1989-12-15· cited 118×
- American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 94×
- Aldrich Enterprises, Inc., Etc. v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1991-10-04· cited 82×
- Bailey v. KirkTenth Circuit· 1985-11-14· cited 71×
- Vinyard v. KingTenth Circuit· 1984-02-16· cited 62×
- Glen Misek and Richard J. Krakowski v. The City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, Harold Washington, Charles A. Pounian and Susan L. WeedSeventh Circuit· 1986-02-11· cited 53×
- Seibert v. State Of OklahomaTenth Circuit· 1989-02-10· cited 53×
- Vosch v. Werner Continental, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-01-07· cited 53×
- Poolaw v. City of AnadarkoTenth Circuit· 1981-09-25· cited 51×
- George Kelly, Cross-Appellee v. Jim Smith, Etc., Cross-AppellantsEleventh Circuit· 1985-07-09· cited 50×
- Riley D. Walker v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1984-03-06· cited 49×
- Adams v. SewellEleventh Circuit· 1991-11-04· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.