Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/22/2002
Wertz v. State
Citations
- 349 S.C. 291
- 562 S.E.2d 654
- 2002 S.C. LEXIS 64
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When a verdict is so confused ... that it is not absolutely clear what the jury intended to do, the safest and best course for the court to pursue is to order a new trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Moore, Pleicones, Toal, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 119×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-27· cited 82×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-06· cited 18×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1931-10-30· cited 18×
- State v. McCaskillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-04· cited 10×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1882-10-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.