State v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding separate rapes to be separate offenses, but upholding general verdict of guilty because the language of the verdict, read in light of the court’s specific instructions as to each count, made it clear that the general verdict covered each count

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Whitener
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-02-08· cited 46×
• State v. Tuckness
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-12-14· cited 45×
• State v. James
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-01-25· cited 26×
• State v. Elliott
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 26×
• State v. Sandoval
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1955-02-02· cited 20×
• State v. Shea
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-02-14· cited 14×
• Carr v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1950-01-19· cited 13×
• Marion Ray Carver v. Mr. Joe R. Martin and the Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Daniel R. McLeod
  Fourth Circuit· 1981-11-24· cited 4×
• Wertz v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-04-22· cited 2×
• No.
  Colorado Attorney General Reports· 1983-08-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pickett
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1876-07-15· cited 22×
• State v. Sheppard
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1899-02-01· cited 16×
• State v. Glover
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1888-01-05· cited 12×
• State v. Haddon
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1897-05-03· cited 9×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1896-01-03· cited 3×