Eighth Circuit· 3/27/2012
Wersal v. Sexton
Citations
- 674 F.3d 1010
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6205
- 2012 WL 996921
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the endorsement clause does not regulate speech with regard to any underlying issues, and thus the candidates are free to state their positions on these issues, in line with White”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Wollman, Beam, Loken, Murphy, Bye, Melloy, Smith, Colloton, Gruender, Benton, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Platt v. Board of Commissioners on GrievancesSixth Circuit· 2014-10-08· cited 72×
- 281 Care Committee v. Ross ArnesonEighth Circuit· 2014-09-02· cited 46×
- Robert Winter, Jr. v. Steven WolnitzekSixth Circuit· 2016-08-24· cited 41×
- Randolph Wolfson v. Colleen ConcannonNinth Circuit· 2016-01-27· cited 14×
- Doe v. NebraskaD. Nebraska· 2012-10-17· cited 14×
- The Florida Bar v. Lanell Williams-YuleeSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-05-01· cited 7×
- Gresham v. RutledgeE.D. Arkansas· 2016-07-27· cited 7×
- Randolph Wolfson v. Colleen ConcannonNinth Circuit· 2014-05-09· cited 6×
- List v. Ohio Elections CommissionS.D. Ohio· 2014-09-11· cited 6×
- Ohio Council 8 American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees v. BrunnerS.D. Ohio· 2012-12-10· cited 4×
- Breaker v. United StatesD. Minnesota· 2013-09-30· cited 3×
- In Re Arthur U. San Agustin v. Superior Court of Guam, People of Guam, Real Party in Interest, Masatomo Nadeau, Real Party in InterestSupreme Court of Guam· 2024-07-18· cited 3×
- Disciplinary Counsel v. RudduckOhio Supreme Court· 2026-04-02· cited 1×
- Konkanok Rabiebna v. Higher Educational Aids BoardWisconsin Supreme Court· 2026-06-18· cited 1×
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court· 1976-02-27· cited 4,982×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court· 1955-05-16· cited 2,510×
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-01-18· cited 2,457×
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 2,030×
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 1,732×
- Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court· 1997-06-09· cited 1,476×
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court· 2001-11-13· cited 1,407×
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-11-08· cited 1,331×
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 1,290×
- Rutan v. Republican Party of IllinoisSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,236×
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 1,222×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-06-08· cited 1,119×
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 958×
- McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 940×
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 938×
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court· 2012-02-21· cited 785×
- Burson v. FreemanSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 765×
Other cases named Wersal v. Sexton
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.