Wendt v. Host International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court abused its discretion in exclud- ing evidence on summary judgment without providing the parties with “the opportunity respectively to lay a foundation for the admission of the survey or to challenge the adequacy of the foundation”
• considering (1) the public’s 19 interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the 20 risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on their 21 merits; and (5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Entrepreneur Media, Inc., a California Corporation v. Scott Smith, an Individual Dba Entrepreneurpr
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-02-11· cited 235×
• Jackson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.
  D. Nevada· 2011-12-05· cited 49×
• Ironhawk Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-04-20· cited 43×
• Daniel Jerden Catrina Jerden v. Paul G. Amstutz, M.D.
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-12-09· cited 37×
• Gary Friedrich Enterprises, LLC v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2010-05-03· cited 28×
• Comedy III Productions, Inc., a California Corp. v. New Line Cinema, a Delaware Amended Corp., Opinion
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-02-04· cited 18×
• Rice v. Fox Broadcasting Co.
  C.D. California· 2001-06-25· cited 14×
• Galentine v. Holland America Line-Westours, Inc.
  W.D. Washington· 2004-03-12· cited 7×
• Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc. v. Perkin-Elmer Corp.
  N.D. California· 2000-01-31· cited 7×
• Self-Insurance Institute of America, Inc. v. Software & Information Industry Ass'n
  C.D. California· 2000-04-27· cited 3×
• Oliner v. Kontrabecki (In Re Central European Industrial Development Co.)
  N.D. California· 2010-03-31· cited 2×
• Laws v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2003-11-04· cited 2×
• George Wendt v. Host International, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-09-22
• Jerden v. Amstutz
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-12-08
• Jerden v. Amstutz
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-01-11

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an Individual
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-06-28· cited 811×
• Jeanette Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, a Federally-Chartered Credit Union Robert W. Fleischman
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-05-18· cited 762×
• E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-02-07· cited 373×
• Tom Waits v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Tracy-Locke, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-10-22· cited 205×
• Kareem Abdul-Jabbar v. General Motors Corporation Leo Burnett Company, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-05-23· cited 178×
• Liberda v. City of Live Oak
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 125×
• Lugosi v. Universal Pictures
  California Supreme Court· 1979-12-03· cited 114×
• Vanna White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., a New York Corporation, and David Deutsch Associates, Inc., a New York Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-08-19· cited 105×
• Eastwood v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-12-01· cited 98×
• The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Gibraltar Financial Corporation of California, and Gibraltar Savings & Loan Association
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-01-31· cited 86×
• Newton v. Thomason
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-04-28· cited 81×
• Lothar Motschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, a Corporation, and William Esty Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1974-06-06· cited 70×
• Bette Midler v. Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Young & Rubicam Inc., a New York Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-06-22· cited 67×
• Wanderer v. Johnston
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-08-09· cited 61×
• Jeffrey M. Masson v. The New Yorker Magazine, Inc. Janet Malcolm Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-06-05· cited 59×
• Fleet v. CBS, INC.
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-11-26· cited 46×
• Nancy Sinatra v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., an Ohio Corporation, Young & Rubicam, Inc., Anew York Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1970-11-20· cited 33×
• Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-01-23· cited 8×

Other cases named Wendt v. Host International, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Wendt v. Host International, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-12-28· cited 1×