Daniel Jerden Catrina Jerden v. Paul G. Amstutz, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that federal courts must apply state law requirements for medical expert testimony pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 601
• ordering a new trial on basis of evidentiary error where appellant had moved post-verdict for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).