Massachusetts Appeals Court· 3/3/1980
Wells v. Wells
Citations
- 400 N.E.2d 1317
- 9 Mass. App. Ct. 321
- 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 1043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]he interests which an employer may protect are trade secrets, confidential data, and good will”
- restraint unlimited in time reduced to fifty-two months
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Rose, Kass
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kroeger v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-03-16· cited 75×
- Alexander & Alexander. Inc. v. DanahyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-01-23· cited 75×
- Boulanger v. Dunkin' Donuts Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-10-01· cited 65×
- New Haven Tobacco Co. v. PerrelliConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-07-28· cited 33×
- Maids International, Inc. v. Ward (In Re Ward)D. Massachusetts· 1996-04-16· cited 25×
- Holland v. HollandWyoming Supreme Court· 2001-11-29· cited 25×
- Outsource International, Incorporated v. George Barton and Barton's Staffing Solutions, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1999-09-17· cited 23×
- Marcam Corp. v. OrchardD. Massachusetts· 1995-04-03· cited 15×
- LG Balfour Co., Inc. v. McGinnisDistrict of Columbia· 1991-02-14· cited 12×
- A.C. Vaccaro, Inc. v. VaccaroMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-10-13· cited 8×
- Schlumberger Well Services v. BlakerS.D. Indiana· 1985-01-23· cited 3×
- Endodontic Associates of Lexington, Inc. v. Johnston-NeeserMassachusetts Superior Court· 2006-03-16· cited 2×
- BNY Mellon, N.A. v. SchauerMassachusetts Superior Court· 2010-05-14· cited 2×
- Cesar v. SundelinMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2012-05-04· cited 1×
- BDO Seidman Financial Services v. GormanMassachusetts Superior Court· 1994-04-08
- Borden & Remington Corp. v. BanischMassachusetts Superior Court· 1999-10-18
- McFarland v. SchneiderMassachusetts Superior Court· 1998-02-17
- Kauzens v. Diamond Diagnostics, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2005-06-02
- People's Choice Mortgage, Inc. v. Premium Capital Funding, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court· 2010-03-31
- Inner-Tite Corp. v. BrozowskiMassachusetts Superior Court· 2010-04-14
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-05-15· cited 371×
- New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-06-03· cited 182×
- Marine Contractors Co. Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-05-08· cited 156×
- All Stainless, Inc. v. ColbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-03-12· cited 148×
- Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1922-06-08· cited 87×
- New Marshall Engine Co. v. Marshall Engine Co.Supreme Court· 1912-02-19· cited 67×
- Richmond Brothers v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1970-03-03· cited 60×
- Old Corner Book Store v. UphamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1907-02-26· cited 45×
- Alston Studios, Inc. v. Lloyd v. Gress & AssociatesFourth Circuit· 1974-02-28· cited 40×
- Anchor Electric Co. v. HawkesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1898-05-18· cited 39×
- Marshall Engine Co. v. New Marshall Engine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1909-10-21· cited 28×
- Tobin v. CodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1962-03-05· cited 27×
- Middlesex Neurological Associates, Inc. v. CohenMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1975-03-21· cited 22×
- National Hearing Aid Centers, Inc. v. AversMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1974-05-23· cited 19×
- United Shoe Machinery Co. v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1907-01-01· cited 10×
- Loranger Construction Co. v. C. Franklin Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1969-04-23· cited 7×
- Auslyn, Inc. v. RousseauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1947-11-04· cited 7×
- Catania v. HalliseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1967-04-04· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.