Alexander & Alexander. Inc. v. Danahy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[u]nexplained delay . . . may indicate an absence of irreparable harm”
• stating that \there are considerations which dictate that noncompetition covenants arising out of the sale of a business be enforced more liberally than such covenants arising out of an employer-employee relationship\
• noting that purchasers often pay a premium for a business’s good will
• upholding five-year restrictive covenant arising out of the sale of a business, court explained why a covenant in that context must be enforced more liberally
• stating “[i]t is not at all unusual for the seller of a business to join the new enterprise in an employment capacity”
• enforcing a covenant not to compete, noting that goodwill is of great importance in the insurance brokerage business because customers tend to rely on key personnel who have previously provided quality service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).