Skip to main content

Wells v. State

Citations

  • 687 P.2d 346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the defendant’s claim that he was entitled to a duress defense because there was no evidence supporting “that [the defendant’s] continued absence resulted from duress, or otherwise justifying [the defendant’s] continuing absence”
  • “A defendant relying on necessity to justify an escape must present some evidence justifying [their] continued absence from custody as well as [their] initial departure.”
  • escape is a continuing offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Singleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.