Skip to main content

State v. Garrison

Citations

  • 171 P.3d 91
  • 2007 Alas. LEXIS 147
  • 2007 WL 3317607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the third prong of the necessity defense requires consideration of the reasonably foreseeable harm that could result from the unlawful conduct, not just the actual harm that did or did not result
  • \A defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on the necessity defense if [they] present 'some evidence' in support of that defense.\
  • “[T]he defendant will be entitled to an instruction on the defense if it is at least sufficient to permit a reasonable juror to find that each element of the defense has been satisfied.”
  • explaining the elements of the necessity defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.