Skip to main content

Welder v. Fritz

Citations

  • 750 S.W.2d 930
  • 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 1218
  • 1988 WL 53018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parties cannot agree to treat a master’s recommendation as if it were an order entered by a district judge for purposes of having it reviewed
  • “It is . . . fundamental that the parties of a suit can neither confer nor waive jurisdiction by agreement or consent.”
  • “It is . . . fundamental that the parties of a suit can neither confer nor waive jurisdiction by agreement or consent.”
  • “It is . . . fundamental that the parties of a suit can neither confer nor waive jurisdiction by agreement or consent.”
  • “It is . . . fundamental that the parties of a suit can neither confer nor waive jurisdiction by agreement or consent.”
  • “It is . . . fundamental that the parties of a suit can neither confer nor waive jurisdiction by agreement or consent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nye, C.J., and Seerden and Dorsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.