Skip to main content

Welch v. State

Citations

  • 289 S.W. 510
  • 154 Tenn. 60
  • 1 Smith & H. 60
  • 1926 Tenn. LEXIS 103

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the presumption is particularly pertinent when considering the use of two or more different words or terms within the same provision of the Constitution
  • noting that “the word ‘houses,’ in our [(Tennessee)] Constitution, would include the ‘curtilage’”
  • noting the land was “in daily use in connection with and as a necessary part of his farming operations”
  • “[T]he word ‘possessions’ was added [to our Constitution] for a purpose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKinney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.