Skip to main content
· 10/8/1965

Chico v. State

Citations

  • 394 S.W.2d 648
  • 217 Tenn. 19
  • 21 McCanless 19
  • 1965 Tenn. LEXIS 515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The law is settled that when the land on which the evidence is found is not possessed as a part of the curtilage or used in the daily operation of the premises, then the constitutional provision against unreasonable searches and seizures does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Btjrnett, Chiee, Dyer, Chattin, Cre-Son

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.