Skip to main content
· 6/27/1995

Welch v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.

Citations

  • 651 N.E.2d 810
  • 1995 Ind. App. LEXIS 726
  • 1995 WL 376474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • jury application of risk-utility analysis with requirement that plaintiff demonstrate safer alternative design
  • “Although the feasibility of a safer design of a prod- uct may be relevant to the ordinary consumer’s expectations about that product, such feasibility is not controlling.”
  • “Although the feasibility of a safer design of a prod- uct may be relevant to the ordinary consumer’s expectations about that product, such feasibility is not controlling.”
  • jury application of risk-utility analysis with requirement that plaintiff demonstrate safer alternative design

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Staton, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.