prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,298 Angelina and Jack McMahon v. Bunn-O-Matic Corporation, James River Paper Company, and Wincup Holdings, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “bare conclusion” offered without explanation or empirical support fails the reliability requirement of Rule 702
• holding that a “bare conclusion” offered without explanation or empirical support fails the reliability requirement of Rule 702
• granting motion to amend pleadings under 28 U.S.C. § 1653 to supply missing jurisdictional details
• \[a]n expert who supplies nothing but a bottom line supplies nothing of value to the judicial process\
• “[a]n expert who supplies nothing but a bottom line supplies nothing of value to the judicial pro‐ cess”
• “[a]n expert who supplies nothing but No. 17‐3390 23 a bottom line supplies nothing of value to the judicial pro‐ cess”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).