Weissman v. Fruchtman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing plaintiffs’ facial challenges to an ordinance as unconstitutional because it was not specifically applied to them
• facial challenges are primarily for benefit of society and normally result in injunctive or declaratory relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Elling O. Eide v. Sarasota County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-08-08· cited 175×
• CMR DN CORP and Marina Towers v. City of Philadelphia
  Third Circuit· 2013-01-14· cited 151×
• Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-04-22· cited 58×
• Richard Reahard Ann P. Reahard v. Lee County
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-10-19· cited 52×
• Liberty Cable Co., Inc. v. City of New York
  S.D. New York· 1995-03-13· cited 16×
• Lake Angelo Associates v. Township of White Lake
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-01-20· cited 13×
• Christian Assembly Rios de Agua Viva v. City of Burbank
  N.D. Illinois· 2017-02-21· cited 6×
• Marathon Outdoor, LLC v. Vesconti
  S.D. New York· 2000-07-28· cited 4×
• Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v. New York City Loft Board
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-01-30· cited 4×
• Waltier v. New York Police Department
  S.D. New York· 1994-06-28· cited 4×
• Weissman v. Fruchtman
  S.D. New York· 1991-06-04· cited 2×

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
• United States v. Salerno
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 5,104×
• Allen v. Wright
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 4,763×
• Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 2,607×
• New York v. Ferber
  Supreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
• Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent
  Supreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 2,188×
• Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,854×
• Secretary of State of Md. v. Joseph H. Munson Co.
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-26· cited 1,054×
• United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1963-04-01· cited 902×
• Hall v. Beals
  Supreme Court· 1969-12-08· cited 608×
• MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County
  Supreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 565×
• Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 490×
• Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation v. Esprit De Corp. And Federated Department Stores, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1985-08-06· cited 351×
• Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Home Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
  Second Circuit· 1983-06-21· cited 335×
• Princeton University v. Schmid
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-13· cited 218×
• Margaret Kinzli Evelyn Goossen Philip Kinzli Ernest Kinzli, Plaintiffs v. City of Santa Cruz
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-08-07· cited 145×
• Gillies v. Delozier
  Supreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 138×
• Porter v. Investors Syndicate
  Supreme Court· 1932-05-31· cited 129×
• Chula Vista City School District v. Bennett
  Supreme Court· 1988-01-25· cited 121×
• Emmanuel D. Patterson v. Thomas A. Coughlin, Iii, Charles P. Hernandez (Sic Charles P. Hermanderz), Harold J. Smith, N. Desantos
  Second Circuit· 1985-05-09· cited 111×