Skip to main content
· 8/6/1985

Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation v. Esprit De Corp. And Federated Department Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 769 F.2d 919
  • 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 585
  • 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 9
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party “cannot rely on inadmissible hearsay in opposing a motion for summary judgment”
  • holding that a party “cannot rely on inadmissible hearsay in opposing a motion for summary judgment”
  • holding that a party opposing summary judgment cannot rely on inadmissible evidence “absent a showing that admissible evidence will be available at trial”
  • holding that the nonmoving party “cannot rely on inadmissible hearsay in opposing a motion for summary judgment . . . absent a showing that admissible evidence will be available at trial.”
  • noting that it is well-settled that a party \cannot rely on inadmissible hearsay in opposing a motion for summary judgment\
  • noting that it is well-settled that a party “cannot rely on inadmissible hearsay in opposing a motion for summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Oakes, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.