Weiss v. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that public policy concerns support use of heightened rigor in judicial review of public-sector arbitration awards
• noting that public policy concerns support use of heightened rigor in judicial review of public-sector arbitration awards
• holding generally, in the arbitration context, that New Jersey “precedents demonstrate quite clearly that the Rules of Professional Conduct ... express a clear mandate of public policy”
• holding generally, in the arbitration context, that New Jersey “precedents demonstrate quite clearly that the Rules of Professional Conduct . . . express a clear mandate of public policy”
• explaining unenforceability of agreement that required withdrawing partners to forfeit their capital accounts
• “arbitrators cannot be permitted to authorize litigants to violate either the law or those public-policy principles that government has established by statute, regulation or otherwise for the protection of the public”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).