· 4/5/2004
Borteck v. RIKER, DANZIG, SCHERER
Citations
- 844 A.2d 521
- 179 N.J. 246
- 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1208
- 2004 N.J. LEXIS 169
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating in case involving law firm's retirement agreement that \it would be unfair to hold [firm] to requirements or standards not embodied in\ rule governing such agreements
- stating in case involving law firm’s retirement agreement that “it would be unfair to hold [firm] to requirements or standards not embodied in” rule governing such agreements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Verniero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.