Skip to main content
· 4/5/2004

Borteck v. RIKER, DANZIG, SCHERER

Citations

  • 844 A.2d 521
  • 179 N.J. 246
  • 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1208
  • 2004 N.J. LEXIS 169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating in case involving law firm's retirement agreement that \it would be unfair to hold [firm] to requirements or standards not embodied in\ rule governing such agreements
  • stating in case involving law firm’s retirement agreement that “it would be unfair to hold [firm] to requirements or standards not embodied in” rule governing such agreements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Verniero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.