Supreme Court· 1/2/1929
Weil v. Neary
Citations
- 278 U.S. 160
- 49 S. Ct. 144
- 73 L. Ed. 243
- 1929 U.S. LEXIS 356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a properly adopted local rule “has the force of law’
- stating that the requirements of Southern District of Florida Local Rule 10(J)(2) are “mandatory and may not be waived”
- condemning manifest evil of an undisclosed fee sharing arrangement as taking the judicial function from the court
- condemning undisclosed fee sharing arrangement as taking the judicial function from the court
- \it is clear that a rule of court thus authorized and made has the force of law\
- local rules have the force of 15 law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taft
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
133 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 504×
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court· 2010-01-13· cited 433×
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court· 1941-03-10· cited 359×
- Roy A. Somlyo v. J. Lu-Rob Enterprises, Inc. And Louis G. BondSecond Circuit· 1991-05-09· cited 306×
- Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationSecond Circuit· 1943-06-08· cited 242×
- Wolf v. WeinsteinSupreme Court· 1963-04-15· cited 218×
- In Re RobertsD. Utah· 1985-02-04· cited 200×
- Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court· 1944-03-13· cited 177×
- John Whitfield v. Charles Scully, Former Supt. Gail Haponik C.O. Tornabene C.O. C. Mitchell John and Jane DoesSecond Circuit· 2001-02-27· cited 141×
- Calnetics Corporation and Meier-Line, Inc. v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., Calnetics Corporation v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., (Five Cases)Ninth Circuit· 1976-02-24· cited 140×
- In The Matter Of Futuronics CorporationSecond Circuit· 1981-08-07· cited 106×
- In Re Eureka Upholstering Co.Second Circuit· 1931-04-06· cited 95×
- In Re Rogers-Pyatt Shellac Co.Second Circuit· 1931-07-07· cited 66×
- In Re EWC, Inc.W.D. Oklahoma· 1992-03-18· cited 65×
- State of Texas v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2015-08-18· cited 64×
- In Re Progress Lektro Shave CorporationSecond Circuit· 1941-02-10· cited 63×
- In The Matter Of Evangeline Refining CompanyFifth Circuit· 1989-12-11· cited 59×
- In Re Chou-Chen Chemicals, Inc.W.D. Kentucky· 1983-07-19· cited 59×
- Petrolite Corporation v. Baker Hughes Incorporated and Baker Performance Chemicals IncorporatedFederal Circuit· 1996-11-05· cited 55×
- Crites, Inc. v. Prudential Ins. Co. Of AmericaSupreme Court· 1944-10-09· cited 53×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court· 1881-04-25· cited 566×
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1900-05-21· cited 111×
- David Lupton's Sons Co. v. Automobile Club of AmericaSupreme Court· 1912-06-07· cited 105×
- Steele v. DrummondSupreme Court· 1927-11-21· cited 91×
- Meguire v. CorwineSupreme Court· 1880-03-18· cited 84×
- Valdes v. LarrinagaSupreme Court· 1914-05-25· cited 56×
- Rio Grande Irrigation & Colonization Co. v. GildersleeveSupreme Court· 1899-05-22· cited 52×
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-03-18· cited 40×
- Wilkinson v. WalkerN.D. Texas· 1923-09-15· cited 6×
Other cases named Weil v. Neary
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.