Skip to main content
· 2/24/1976

Calnetics Corporation and Meier-Line, Inc. v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., Calnetics Corporation v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., (Five Cases)

Citations

  • 532 F.2d 674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[F]ailure to consider production cross-elasticity [i]s inconsistent with the views of the Supreme Court and of this circuit.”
  • “We hold that, if distributor is able on remand to prove that counterdefendants indeed committed acts of commercial bribery in violation of [§] 2(c), then the defendants ought to be allowed any damages proximately caused by that violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Choy, Goodwin, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.