Weed v. BACHNER CO. INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding procurement official was entitled to qualified immunity for allegedly tortious conduct arising out of bid evaluations
• stating that qualified official immunity is overcome when the official's conduct is \outrageous or evidence[s] reckless indifference\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Powercorp Alaska, LLC v. Alaska Energy Authority
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2012-10-12· cited 16×
• Bachner Company, Inc. v. Weed
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2013-12-06· cited 8×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Aspen Exploration Corp. v. Sheffield
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 56×
• Prentzel v. State, Department of Public Safety
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2007-09-14· cited 46×
• Bowers Office Products, Inc. v. University of Alaska
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1988-05-13· cited 40×
• Smith v. Stafford
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2008-08-08· cited 39×
• Gostovich v. City of West Richland
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-03-27· cited 32×
• Shellburne, Inc. v. Roberts
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1968-01-18· cited 23×
• McBirney & Associates v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1988-04-15· cited 20×
• J & S SERVICES, INC. v. Tomter
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2006-07-21· cited 19×
• Kila, Inc. v. State, Department of Administration
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1994-07-08· cited 6×
• State, Department of Administration v. Bachner Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2007-09-14· cited 3×