J & S SERVICES, INC. v. Tomter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that \claims against ... a procurement officer acting within the course and scope of his duties\ would appear to be barred by the exclusive remedy provision
• \Amendment to the pleadings may be proper on remand.\ (citing Swift v. Kniffen, 706 P.2d 296, 305 n. 11 (Alaska 1985))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).