Skip to main content

Webster v. Pacesetter, Inc.

Citations

  • 259 F. Supp. 2d 27
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6284
  • 2003 WL 1889246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff cannot create an issue of fact regarding a state-law tort claim through evidence about the defendant’s communications with a federal agency
  • finding that the plaintiffs “failed to sustain their burden under the risk-utility balancing test” where, among other deficiencies, “they have not provided any information about the cost of avoiding any supposed danger”
  • dismissing the plaintiffs’ breach of implied warranty claim “because ‘a breach of warranty claim is not actionable in coordination with a products liability claim? ” (quoting Dyson ex rel. Monroe v. Winfield, 113 F.Supp.2d 35, 42 (D.D.C. 2000))
  • allegations of defendants’ “failure to adhere to the FDA regulations on recordkeeping, labeling, design validation and establishment and maintenance of complaint file” were impliedly preempted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.