District of Columbia· 4/16/2003
Webster v. Pacesetter, Inc.
Citations
- 259 F. Supp. 2d 27
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6284
- 2003 WL 1889246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a plaintiff cannot create an issue of fact regarding a state-law tort claim through evidence about the defendant’s communications with a federal agency
- finding that the plaintiffs “failed to sustain their burden under the risk-utility balancing test” where, among other deficiencies, “they have not provided any information about the cost of avoiding any supposed danger”
- dismissing the plaintiffs’ breach of implied warranty claim “because ‘a breach of warranty claim is not actionable in coordination with a products liability claim? ” (quoting Dyson ex rel. Monroe v. Winfield, 113 F.Supp.2d 35, 42 (D.D.C. 2000))
- allegations of defendants’ “failure to adhere to the FDA regulations on recordkeeping, labeling, design validation and establishment and maintenance of complaint file” were impliedly preempted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Baycol Products LitigationD. Minnesota· 2007-07-16· cited 36×
- Webster v. Pacesetter, Inc.District of Columbia· 2003-07-01· cited 19×
- Rollins v. Wackenhut Services, Inc.District of Columbia· 2011-08-10· cited 18×
- Kubicki ex rel. Kubicki v. Medtronic, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2018-02-05· cited 14×
- Gresser v. Dow Chemical Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-04-30· cited 12×
- Rheinfrank v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2015-08-10· cited 11×
- Hughes v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATIONS.D. Mississippi· 2009-11-12· cited 6×
- In Re Trasylol Products Liability Litigation-MDL-1928S.D. Florida· 2010-05-10· cited 6×
- Price v. Stryker CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-15· cited 2×
- Murray v. Motorola, Inc.D. Maryland· 2004-07-19· cited 2×
- King v. Synthes (U.S.A.)S.D. Mississippi· 2006-03-31· cited 1×
- In Re Baycol Products LitigationD. Minnesota· 2007-07-09
- Unnamed caseIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-04-30
- Simmons v. Textron, Inc.District of Columbia· 2025-03-24
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court· 2001-02-21· cited 956×
- Washington Post Company v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesD.C. Circuit· 1989-01-06· cited 355×
- Bennett v. KigginsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-08-18· cited 157×
- Edward William Hull, A/K/A Edward Hull v. Eaton Corporation Edward William Hull Travelers Insurance Company v. Eaton CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1987-08-04· cited 76×
- Northern Trust Co. v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-04-26· cited 69×
- Hill v. Squibb & Sons, ERMontana Supreme Court· 1979-04-05· cited 54×
- Clifford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-09-30· cited 42×
- Warner Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. BostonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-02-23· cited 30×
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. NuttDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-10· cited 24×
- Mampe v. Ayerst LaboratoriesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-14· cited 21×
- William D. Beetler, D/B/A Klein's Beauty Salon, and Sandra Roehm Moore v. Sales Affiliates, Inc., a CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1970-08-19· cited 13×
- MacPherson v. Searle & Co.District of Columbia· 1991-10-15· cited 13×
- Word v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-12-09· cited 12×
- Pappas v. Ford Motor Co.District of Columbia· 1998-04-16· cited 8×
- Dyson v. WinfieldDistrict of Columbia· 2000-09-21· cited 7×
- Willard v. Park Industries, Inc.D. New Hampshire· 1999-01-05· cited 4×
- Dyson v. Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc.District of Columbia· 2001-01-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.