Skip to main content

Hill v. Squibb & Sons, ER

Citations

  • 592 P.2d 1383
  • 181 Mont. 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether a warning on package inserts from pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors was adequate required expert testimony
  • expert evidence required to determine adequacy of a warning directed to physicians

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haswell, Sheehy, Daly, Harrison, Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.