Court of Appeals of Arizona· 4/15/1999
Webb v. State
Citations
- 194 Ariz. 117
- 977 P.2d 839
- 293 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 23
- 1999 Ariz. App. LEXIS 56
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the policy to interpret ambiguities regarding timing “in favor of preserving the right to appeal and against the forfeiture of that right upon a technicality”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fidel, Grant, Lankford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Southwestern Paint & Varnish Co. v. Arizona Department of Environmental QualityArizona Supreme Court· 1999-03-16· cited 43×
- Hill v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court· 1999-03-09· cited 40×
- Registration Control Systems, Inc. v. Compusystems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1990-12-20· cited 39×
- Doug Roy, Jr., Individually v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, a German Corporation, DefendantsNinth Circuit· 1985-11-29· cited 29×
- Owens v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-11-15· cited 28×
- Rodriquez v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court· 1969-03-13· cited 23×
- Dioguardi v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-01-17· cited 18×
- Rosen v. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF STATECourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-11-09· cited 12×
- Butler Products Co., Inc. v. RoushCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-08-14· cited 11×
- Porterfield v. Black Bill & Doney Parks Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court· 1949-10-03· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.