Skip to main content
· 3/13/1969

Rodriquez v. Williams

Citations

  • 451 P.2d 609
  • 104 Ariz. 280
  • 1969 Ariz. LEXIS 258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that procedures to restore records “can best take place in the trial court”
  • holding \we look to substance rather than to form\ of pleadings and treating a motion for new trial as a motion to suspend the appeal and to reinstate the trial court's jurisdiction over the case
  • stating that reviewing courts prefer to look to substance rather than form
  • Recalling witnesses may be appropriate “if a point arises upon which the parties cannot agree and the trial judge cannot remember.”
  • looking “to substance rather than to form” in determining intended effect of pleading
  • looking “to substance rather than to form” in determining intended effect of pleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Udall, Lockwood, Struck-Meyer, McFarland, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.