Wayne v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims which could have been raised in previous postconviction petitions were barred under the Knaffla rule despite the petitioner having never filed a direct appeal
• discussing Wayne’s request for DNA testing of bloodstained clothing relied on by the prosecutor at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hooper v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-10-30· cited 55×
• Quick v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-11-13· cited 14×
• Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-10-14· cited 13×
• Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-07-22· cited 12×
• Wayne v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-03-27· cited 11×
• Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-03-11· cited 11×
• Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-09-09· cited 9×
• Wayne v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-06-12· cited 7×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-01-31· cited 6×
• Washington v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-03-11· cited 5×
• Hathaway v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-12-06· cited 5×
• Jihad v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-05-25· cited 3×
• Wayne v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-06-06· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Knaffla
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-06-25· cited 418×
• State v. Rainer
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-07-16· cited 47×
• State v. Fenney
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-11-03· cited 40×
• Dent v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-06-09· cited 17×
• Wayne v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-04-09· cited 16×
• Michael Wayne, Also Known as Michael Wayne Fenney v. Dennis Benson, Warden
  Eighth Circuit· 1996-08-14· cited 14×