Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota

Syllabus

1. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the appellant's petition for postconviction relief because the petition was time-barred, and the evidence proffered under the newly-discovered-evidence exception failed to establish, by a clear and convincing standard, that the appellant is innocent. 2. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the petition for postconviction relief because appellant did not establish that the interests of justice require a new trial. Affirmed.