Waugh v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting petitioner’s attempt to “frame [his] argument” for a continuance “as a denial of due process.”
• stating that Padilla does not disturb rule
• rejecting claim that BIA ignored its own precedents in denying a continuance because alien’s argument in fact asserted that the IJ and BIA “should have found the circumstances warranted a continuation,” a claim that raised neither a constitutional nor a legal issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).