Paredes v. Attorney General of United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the pendency of post-conviction motion does not negate the finality of convictions for immigration removal purposes
• collecting cases and concluding that pendency of collateral proceedings “does not vitiate finality”
• pendency of post-conviction motions or other forms of collateral attack do not negate finality of conviction for immigration removal purposes “unless and until the convictions are overturned as a result of the collateral motions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).