Watts v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the circuit court should have treated [a habeas corpus] petition as a motion for postconviction relief, despite its improper title.”
• “Therefore, the circuit court should have treated Watts’ petition as a motion for postconviction relief, despite its improper title.” (citing Bixler v. State, 971 So.2d 934, 935 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clough v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-31· cited 10×
• Hall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-07· cited 1×
• Rodgers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-23
• Bruno v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-03

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Valdez-Garcia v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-19· cited 54×
• Bixler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-21· cited 3×