Bixler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that habeas is not appropriate where rule 3.850 provides an adequate mechanism to address issues raised by the defendant
• holding that circuit court should have treated the habeas petition as a motion for postconviction relief
• affirming trial court order that dismissed habeas petition where although trial court had erroneously concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition, any collateral attack would have been time-barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Batista v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-10· cited 6×
• Watts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-21· cited 4×
• Bruno v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-03

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Valdez-Garcia v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-19· cited 54×
• In Re Rule 3.850 of Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-12-19· cited 9×
• Bixler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-30· cited 2×
• Bixler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-25· cited 2×
• Bixler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-10· cited 2×