Skip to main content

Watson v. Watson

Citations

  • 583 So. 2d 410
  • 1991 WL 138878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding where face of order setting trial shows that trial court did not mail notice to appellant’s correct address, trial court abuses its discretion in denying motion to set aside judgment
  • holding it is well settled that “[w]hen a party has no notice of a trial date, the trial court abuses its discretion when it proceeds with a final hearing.”
  • reversing the denial of a motion to set aside a final judgment where the face of the order showed that the trial court did not mail notice to appellant’s correct address
  • reversing order denying motion to set aside a final judgment where the court did not mail the notice of trial to the party’s correct address because “a judgment entered without notice to a party is void”
  • reversing order denying motion to set aside a final judgment where the court did not mail the notice of trial to the party’s correct address, and explaining: “It is well settled that a judgment entered without notice to a party is void.”
  • it is well settled that a judgment entered without notice to a party is void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.