Skip to main content
· 7/19/1988

Shields v. Flinn

Citations

  • 528 So. 2d 967
  • 1988 WL 75411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that rule 1.540 “provides for the review of final judgments, orders, and decrees only.”
  • holding that, because Shields did not receive notice of the trial, the judgment was void, and thus, the trial court erred by denying Shield’s motion to vacate the dismissal, which was filed approximately two years after the entry of the judgment under rule 1.540(b)(4)
  • review of order denying relief does not include merits of final decree sought to be vacated or any other order or judgment
  • relief from void judgment may be granted at any time
  • “A judgment entered without notice to a party is void.”
  • relief from void judgment may be granted at any time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, Nesbitt and Daniel S. Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.