Watson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that conviction for grand theft violated double jeopardy because it did not involve separate and distinct criminal episode from burning with intent to defraud and filing false insurance claim
• reversing conviction for grand theft, which did not involve separate and distinct criminal episode from offense of filing false insurance claim or offense of burning with intent to defraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kist v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-13· cited 5×
• LaRoche v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-09· cited 3×
• Hays v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-02· cited 2×
• Saddler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-23· cited 2×
• Lewis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-13· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sirmons v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-02-03· cited 99×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-11-12· cited 29×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-12· cited 18×