LaRoche v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that convictions violate double jeopardy because the same actions constituted the basis for grand theft and insurance fraud convictions
• on' direct appeal, holding convictions violated double jeopardy because the same action constituted the basis for the defendant’s grand theft and insurance fraud convictions; vacating insurance fraud conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kist v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-13· cited 5×
• Hays v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-02· cited 2×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-20

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-11-12· cited 29×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-12· cited 18×
• Vasquez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-03· cited 9×
• State v. McDonald
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-19· cited 8×
• Wolf v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-06· cited 7×
• Watson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-31· cited 6×
• Sinclair v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-10· cited 2×