Skip to main content
· 8/29/1996

Watson v. Metropolitan Transit Commission

Citations

  • 553 N.W.2d 406
  • 1996 Minn. LEXIS 602
  • 1996 WL 490754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that safety issues and financial burdens he at the center of discretionary policy decisions
  • holding that bus driver’s decision not to stop bus when gang members assaulted and threatened to kill passengers was discretionary
  • holding that the decision by the Chief of Transit Police not to place security personnel on the bus where plaintiff was beaten was protected by statutory immunity
  • holding that the decision by the Chief of Transit Police not to place security per sonnel on the bus where plaintiff was beaten was protected by statutory immunity
  • stating that the government employer was entitled to vicarious official immunity despite the official not being named in the suit
  • stating that the government employer was entitled to vicarious official immunity despite the official not being named in the suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.