Skip to main content
· 12/16/1994

Steinke v. City of Andover

Citations

  • 525 N.W.2d 173
  • 1994 Minn. LEXIS 970
  • 1994 WL 700968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating statutory immunity protects the government only when it can produce , evidence its conduct was of a policy-making nature
  • exercising only scientific or professional judgment to implement a policy manual is not discretionary
  • common earthen drainage ditch not hidden or artificial condition, where plaintiff failed to make even cursory inspection of land before snowmobiling
  • “Discretionary immunity protects the government only when it can produce evidence its conduct was of a policy-making nature involving social, political, or economic considerations, rather than merely professional or scientific judgments.”
  • “We have recognized that the government’s initial decision, whether to place signs warning the public of potential hazards, is protected as a discretionary function because it involves the consideration of several policy factors.”
  • “[The county’s] decision to place signs only along county roads and recognized right-of-ways involved more than merely a professional or scientific judgment; it involved the type of political, social and economic considerations that lie at the center of discretionary action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.