Skip to main content

Watson v. Brown

Citations

  • 686 P.2d 12
  • 67 Haw. 252
  • 1984 Haw. LEXIS 116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a statutory remedy is \merely cumulative and does not abolish an existing common law remedy unless so declared in express terms or by necessary implication\
  • holding that a statutory remedy is “merely cumulative and does not abolish an existing common law remedy unless so declared in express terms or by necessary implication”
  • stating that “[a] statutory remedy is, as a rule, merely cumulative and does not abolish an existing common law remedy unless so declared in express terms or by necessary implication”
  • indicating eviction is generally a cause of action in landlord-tenant cases
  • “A statutory remedy is, as a rule, merely cumulative and does not abolish existing common law remedy unless so declared in express terms or by necessary implication.”
  • \[Q]uestions of fact [are] for the jury to decide[.]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.