Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 4/1/1994

Watson v. Blankinship

Citations

  • 20 F.3d 383
  • 1994 WL 107281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • severing claims because, despite occurring during the same timeframe, they were not sufficiently related to be properly joined
  • “Every separate and distinct claim must individually meet the amount in controversy.”
  • “Every separate and distinct claim must individually meet the amount in controversy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Logan, Seth, Seymour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Watson v. Blankinship

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.