Watkins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence that the complainant placed her tongue “on” the defendant’s anus was insufficient to establish anal penetration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Paz
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-04-14· cited 35×
• In re B.H.
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2016-05-26· cited 7×
• FRANCISCO HENRY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-01· cited 2×
• In the Matter of B.H.
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2016-05-26

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lynch v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-13· cited 390×
• Jackson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-09-24· cited 78×
• Seagrave v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-07-12· cited 74×
• Richards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-02· cited 24×
• Gill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-25· cited 11×
• Donton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-08· cited 10×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-04· cited 9×
• Furlow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-10· cited 9×
• Marles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-25· cited 2×