Johnson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction for digital penetration of the victim’s anus, because the court erroneously instructed the jury that union, or coming into contact, with the victim’s anus was sufficient to prove sexual battery, which was fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Anderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-28· cited 15×
• Saidi v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-30· cited 15×
• Ward v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-09· cited 11×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-07· cited 10×
• Hubbard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-03· cited 6×
• Neal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-09· cited 4×
• Watkins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-13· cited 4×
• Troy William Armstrong v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-04-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Delva
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-02-21· cited 308×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-12-13· cited 36×
• Wallis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-07· cited 12×
• Crump v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-10· cited 8×