Skip to main content

Waters v. State

Citations

  • 443 A.2d 500
  • 1982 Del. LEXIS 357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the failure to provide definitional guidance was reversible error because the court merely read the statute and offered no definition of key terms, including differentiating “reckless” and the meaning of “cruel, wicked and depraved indifference to human life”
  • “the words ‘cruel, wicked and depraved indifference to human life’ are words with a commonly accepted meaning” that is not unconstitutionally vague
  • “the words ‘cruel, wicked and depraved indifference to human life’ are words with a commonly accepted meaning” that is not unconstitutionally vague
  • held it was plain and reversible error for the Superior Court to refrain from providing the jury with a definition of “cruel, wicked and depraved indifference to human life”
  • trial judge erred by failing to distinguish “reckless” as it relates to Murder in the Second Degree from “reckless” as it relates to Manslaughter; and to explain the meaning of the words “cruel, wicked and depraved indifference to human life.”
  • describing error in jury instructions as “plain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herrmann, Duffy, Horsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.