S.D. New York· 12/29/1939
Waterman v. Aakre
Citations
- 31 F. Supp. 8
- 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1782
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The limitation of liability section clearly states that 17 the limit applies regardless of the number of vehicles involved in the accident.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woolsey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Earle & Stoddart, Inc. v. Ellerman's Wilson Line, Ltd.Supreme Court· 1932-12-12· cited 65×
- Lewys v. O'NEILLS.D. New York· 1931-04-22· cited 52×
- Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend Corp.Supreme Court· 1935-04-29· cited 48×
- Bank Line, Ltd. v. PorterFourth Circuit· 1928-04-10· cited 47×
- Southern Pac. Co. v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1934-07-31· cited 40×
- Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaS.D. New York· 1931-09-14· cited 32×
- Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend CorporationSecond Circuit· 1934-07-31· cited 32×
- Briggs v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1930-12-11· cited 31×
- The El SolS.D. New York· 1930-11-19· cited 29×
- Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend CorporationS.D. New York· 1932-03-23· cited 17×
- The IdaSecond Circuit· 1935-02-04· cited 12×
- Porter v. Bank Line, Ltd.E.D. Virginia· 1927-01-28· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.